This alleged UFO was captured near the Freedom Tower in New York. The MUFON report states this diamond object was photographed, blah, blah, blah… I will make it simple. It’s not a diamond, it’s a rectangle. It looks like a diamond because of the perspective of the photographer. Look at the line at the bottom of the object, it runs in a similar parallel to the lines on the roof, so it’s a rectangle.
The ‘markings’ and ‘windows’ are in fact lettering. This is a banner. What it’s doing there is of zero interest to me. It’s a banner. All the web pages that are running with this are not my concern. It’s a banner.
So let me get this straight… a guy walks out of the factory, the security tape goes offline briefly, the guy goes missing for two hours, staggers back, throws up and that is your evidence for alien abduction? Hey, don’t take my word for it, check the link out
Also on this page is the report of the abduction of an entire village in China, the ‘reportedly’ is not a big word, but it’s doing a lot in this report. This is my big point about alien abduction: these half-baked, and half-researched, sensationalist stories do more harm than good and are the main reason abduction is still considered a research back-water.
This summer saw a sharp ‘spike’ in UFO sightings in the United States. This does happen periodically on a global scale. These ‘flaps’ can sometimes be tracked to when Earth is closest to Mars (although personally I see that as just a statistical anomaly) or, in fact, we just don’t know why they happen. They just do. Here is a nice little info-graphic from livescience.com which breaks it down histogram style… Also a handy guide for those reporting UFOs…
The recent death of Budd Hopkins and Charles Hickson, the claims of Budd’s ex-wife and the whole Emma Woods debacle has made me think a lot about the whole abduction scenario. It was Hickson’s death that made me revisit his experience and what struck me was how weird it actually was. Not just in what he claimed happened, but how different it was to what we now take as a ‘typical’ abduction experience. (If being abducted by aliens could ever be considered ‘typical’). Over time we have almost accepted alien abduction as having a standardised template, almost as if there is Standard Operating Procedure (SOP).
It wasn’t always this way, previously abductions were carried out by a whole range of weird and wonderful beings. The SOP of capture, probe and a chat was still fairly typical, but the aliens involved were very, very different. Here in the United Kingdom, the majority of abductions were carried out by tall, blonde haired, Nordic looking beings. These abductors were carrying out their abductions in the 50′s, 60′s,70′s and then something changed. During this time, abductions by Greys were few and far between. Suddenly, something changed, and the Greys were more common place whilst the Nordics were seldom seen.
The claim that the SOP never changes and is so common between all abductees is usually trotted out as a reason why abduction is a genuine phenomena, but this confirmation bias is a huge chink in the subjects armour. Not all experiences are the same, and you do have to question why you are being told that.
On September 14th, famous abductess CHARLES Hickson, whose claimed 1973 abduction by a UFO drew widespread attention, has died.
Hickson and Calvin Parker were fishing on the Pascagoula River in southern Mississippi on October 11, 1973, when the pair said they were abducted and probed by aliens, and then released from their spacecraft.
Considered one of the most seminal UFO/Abductee encounters, Hickson never waivered from his claims, a good description of the enitre experience can be found here
Leslie Kean’s documentary is now online….
It was reported yesterday that legendary Abduction researcher Budd Hopkins passed away. He will be sorely missed.
As part of it’s on-going release of documents the MoD has delivered another batch of it’s UFO files. They are available to download for free for the first month, fee’s applicable after that.
The timing of Conrad’s comments is curious, considering the UK is about to release more documents this week. Halt’s response is as follows, expect this to run for a while yet:
I will have to assume you’re looking to print the truth, not “sell” a sensational story. Ted Conrad is either having memory problems, has his
head in the sand or continuing the cover up. Even his son has admitted to family talk substantiating the incident. Let’s start with his
investigation. I interviewed the witnesses, collected their statements (I still have them) and then took the witnesses to Conrad to tell their
account. I took Conrad and his family to the site in the forest and showed him the depressions.
When I talked with Gordon Williams neither he nor Conrad wanted their name mentioned with the incident. Thus, I was directed to get with Don Moreland (RAF) and see what he wanted as it was to become a British affair. I did so and he asked for a memo. I wrote it and it was typed by Conrad’s secretary. Conrad read it, showed it to Williams and both approved. It was never meant for public dissemination.
Conrad has his chronology mixed up but that’s understandable. Thru the years Conrad has made conflicting statements about the events. First he
stated he never went out to look in the sky. Then stated he never saw anything. Apparently he doesn’t remember talking to me on his radio [about
seeing a UFO sending down beams of light onto the base].
He and you need to read Robert Hastings book “UFO’s and Nukes”. Hastings has gotten confirmation from the Air Traffic Controllers on duty that saw the object flash by and go into the forest and even observed it on their scope, He’s gotten statements from SPs as well as a Communications man
working in the WSA stating their sightings. He’s even dug up the RAF Controller that picked up something on his scope.
Remind Conrad of his article in the OMNI Magazine dated March 1983. It’s on page 115 and titled UFO Update. In the article he describes the first
incident in detail and concludes “those lads saw something, but I don’t know what it was”. Now he’s smearing those involved. It’s pretty clear there was a very intense confrontation with something in the forest. Does Conrad want to talk about how the airmen were then subjected to mind
control efforts using drugs and hypnosis by British and American authorities? Yes, Burroughs and Penniston have issues that relate to the events. Who wouldn’t! A Wannabe was even drug into the event and messed with. (I think he must mean ‘dragged into the event- DH) There are a lot more details substantiating the event but I’m not going to bore you.
I suppose having to look for details or the truth is less important than the “story”. It’s sad but I’ve come to understand how the main stream
press works. Truth gives way to the “Story”. Prove me wrong!